Potential application
Can an operator review what was planned, done and checked?
Treatment verification
Reconcile the approved job with available logs, operator observations and follow-up inspection, making evidence gaps explicit.
A proposed pilot workflow, not a customer result or evidence of a deployed combined system. Data availability, integrations and operating suitability must be confirmed.
Discuss a pilotConnected workflow
From observations to a reviewed decision.
- Approved job
- Available job logs
- Operator review
- Follow-up check
- 01
Preserve the approved job
Record the intended targets, approved dosage and operating constraints before flight. Keep revisions and approval references available to the operator.
- 02
Collect available activity records
Gather flight and application logs where available, plus operator observations and exceptions. Identify what each record actually measures rather than treating every log as proof of spray delivery.
- 03
Reconcile plan and activity
An operator reviews the planned job against the available records, marking confirmed activity, discrepancies and unresolved gaps. Any AgriSense treatment-record integration remains subject to verification.
- 04
Inspect the follow-up
Use a dated follow-up inspection to review condition and decide whether clarification or more field work is required. A later observation does not by itself prove what dose was delivered.
Supported decisions
What people could decide.
- Which planned work can the available evidence support?
- Which exceptions require operator clarification?
- Where is an additional inspection or record needed?
Proposed measures
What a pilot should check.
- Completeness of approval and activity records
- Reconciled job status and documented exceptions
- Follow-up inspection coverage
- Unresolved discrepancies and evidence gaps
Evidence needed to assess value
The aircraft’s GPS route records aircraft movement. It is not the location of individual AI detections and does not establish precise per-tree spray delivery. Such verification would require appropriate measured, traceable records.
Scope and limitations
Treatment verification here means operator review of available evidence, not an independent audit, guaranteed compliance or independently verified per-tree spraying.
AgriSense sensor connections, persistent tree identity, treatment-record integration and predictive support remain directions requiring implementation and field validation. Spectral indices support inspection; people approve treatment. LIBS is a separate concept, not an operational AgriSense input.